TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Klosters Rederi Aktieselskab v. Amtorg Trading Corp.

KLOSTERS REDERI AKTIESELSKAB v. AMTORG TRADING CORPORATION

Klosters Rederi Aktieselskab v. Amtorg Trading Corp., 7 F. Supp. 727 (S.D.N.Y. 1934)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court, S.D. New York · Federal District Courts
Decided
February 27, 1934
Judges
Bondy
Citations
7 F. Supp. 7271934 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1993

Opinion of the Court — Bondy

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

BONDY, District Judge.

The contract of sale by the respondent, Amtorg Trading Corporation, to the White Sea Pulpwood Corporation, provided not only for a sale at a specified price, but also for the discharge of the cargo by the White Sea Pulpwood Corporation at an average of not less than 500 cords for each weather working day, lay days to commence when vessel is in berth designated by the White Sea Pulpwood Corporation. It further provided that the buyer shall pay to the seller demurrage to which the vessel is entitled but at not more than a certain rate.

A contract to unload a vessel is maritime in its nature. See Netherlands American Steam Navigation Co. v. Gallagher (C. C. A.) 283 F. 171, 181 ; The Thomas P. Beal (D. C.) 295 F. 877 ; Terminal Shipping Co. v. Hamberg (D. C.) 222 F. 1020 .

This maritime obligation contained in the contract of sale can be enforced in admiralty. See Compagnie Francaise de Navigation a Vapeur v. Bonnasse (C. C. A.) 19 F. (2d) 777; The Thomas P. Beal (D. C.) 295 F. 877 ; Gowanus Storage Co., Inc. v. U. S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. (D. C.) 271 F. 528 .

The exceptions to the petition to implead the White Sea Pulpwood Corporation accordingly are overruled.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1985: 119852026peak 1985 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. SUN REFINING & MARKETING v. Goldstein Oil Co.620 F. Supp. 121 (E.D. Mo. 1985)

Most recent

  1. SUN REFINING & MARKETING v. Goldstein Oil Co.620 F. Supp. 121 (E.D. Mo. 1985)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Holmes v. Crowell & Thurlow S. S. Co., 295 F. 877 (W.D. Wash. 1924) 8
Commodores Point Terminal Co. v. Hudnall, 283 F. 150 (S.D. Fla. 1922) 18
Gowanus Storage Co. v. United States Shipping Bd. Emergency Fleet Corp., 271 F. 528 (E.D.N.Y. 1921) 11
Terminal Shipping Co. v. Hamberg, 222 F. 1020 (D. Maryland 1915) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list