TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Agwi Nav. Co.

In re Agwi Nav. Co., 9 F. Supp. 501 (S.D.N.Y. 1934)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court, S.D. New York · Federal District Courts
Decided
December 4, 1934
Judges
Patterson
Citations
9 F. Supp. 5011934 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1240

Opinion of the Court — Patterson

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PATTERSON, District Judge.

The case is in admiralty. The petitioners have filed a petition for limitation of liability. Certain claimants now move for discovery and inspection of documents in possession of the petitioners and for oral examination before trial of petitioners’ officers and agents.

None of the moving claimants have as yet filed answers to the petition, and the case is not at issue. Admiralty Rule 32 of the Supreme Court (28 USCA § 723), is to the effect that, “after joinder of' issue, and before trial,” discovery and inspection of papers relative to any matter in issue may be applied for by any party. The inference is a plain one that prior to joinder of issue no discovery is permissible. And, if general oral examination before trial of an adversary’s officers and agents is permissible at all in admiralty cases, the practice is certainly not permissible before issue joined. The application must therefore be denied as premature.

In view of this conclusion, it would not be appropriate to pass on the other contentions at the present time.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1950: 11951: 119502026peak 1950 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Dowling v. Isthmian S.S. Corporation184 F.2d 758 (3d Cir. 1950)
  2. Ludena v. Santa Luisa95 F. Supp. 790 (S.D.N.Y. 1951)

Most recent

  1. Ludena v. Santa Luisa95 F. Supp. 790 (S.D.N.Y. 1951)
  2. Dowling v. Isthmian S.S. Corporation184 F.2d 758 (3d Cir. 1950)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list