TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.

Am. Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co., 11 F. Supp. 26 (S.D.N.Y. 1935)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court, S.D. New York · Federal District Courts
Decided
June 4, 1935
Judges
Mack
Citations
11 F. Supp. 261935 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1527

Opinion of the Court — Mack

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

MACK, Circuit Judge.

This application prays for a permanent injunction against the city of New York, acting by the Transit Commission, restraining the further prosecution of an action heretofore commenced in the New York Supreme Court against the Inter-borough Company and its receiver for a declaratory judgment to determine the obligations of the company undei' contract 3 and related certificates.- The briefs submitted on behalf of the Transit Commission are for the most part a rearguxnent of the questions decided by this court on January 18, 1935, when it denied the applications of the city, acting separately by the Transit Commission and by its corporation counsel, for leave to bring just such a suit as this in the state courts. 10 F. Supp. 512 . The order entered on *27 the application of the city, acting by its corporation counsel, was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals on April 1, 1935, 76 F.(2d) 1002 , and certiorari was denied June 3, 1935, City of New York v. Murray, 55 S. Ct. 923 , 79 L. Ed. -; no appeal was taken from the order on the city’s application, acting by the Transit Commission. The court having, in the exercise of its discretionary powers, denied leave to bring the suit, necessarily determined that there was no absolute right so to sue; otherwise, the denial would have been an abuse of discretion. On careful reconsideration, I am still of the opinion then expressed. It follows, therefore, that the prosecution of such a suit, when brought during the pendency of this receivership proceeding without leave of this court, must be enjoined.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1935: 119352026peak 1935 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Murray v. Transit Commission11 F. Supp. 27 (S.D.N.Y. 1935)

Most recent

  1. Murray v. Transit Commission11 F. Supp. 27 (S.D.N.Y. 1935)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Am. Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co., 10 F. Supp. 512 (S.D.N.Y. 1935) 20
N.Y. City v. Murray, 295 U.S. 760 (1935) 11

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list