TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re G. W. Giannini, Inc.

In re G. W. Giannini, Inc., 14 F. Supp. 1005 (S.D.N.Y. 1936)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court, S.D. New York · Federal District Courts
Decided
May 18, 1936
Docket
No. 63662
Judges
Knox
Citations
14 F. Supp. 10051936 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1430

Opinion of the Court — Knox

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

KNOX, District Judge.

Report confirmed. Under the law as declared in the authorities cited in the opinion of the referee, it seems apparent that the attorney for the receiver cannot be compensated out of funds of the bankrupt. In view of the services rendered, this is unfortunate, but I am without power to vary the rule which forbids the payment.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1936: 11941: 119362026peak 1936 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Progress Lektro Shave Corporation117 F.2d 602 (2d Cir. 1941)
  2. In re Owl Drug Co.16 F. Supp. 139 (D. Nev. 1936)

Most recent

  1. In re Progress Lektro Shave Corporation117 F.2d 602 (2d Cir. 1941)
  2. In re Owl Drug Co.16 F. Supp. 139 (D. Nev. 1936)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list