TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Barbara Schwarz v. United States Commission on Civil Rights

Schwarz v. United States Comm'n on Civil Rights, 102 F.3d 1272 (D.C. Cir. 1996)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 6, 1996
Docket
No. 96-5184
Citations
102 F.3d 1272322 U.S. App. D.C. 2441996 WL 6543801996 U.S. App. LEXIS 30524
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

102 F.3d 1272 322 U.S.App.D.C. 244

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant. Barbara SCHWARZ, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS, Appellee.

No. 96-5184.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Nov. 6, 1996.

Before: SILBERMAN, RANDOLPH, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

1

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. Upon consideration of appellant's motions to expedite, for default, and to correct the docket; appellant's brief; and the record, it is 2

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the district court's order filed May 30, 1996, be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated therein. Appellant has identified no basis for the district court's jurisdiction over her complaint. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 36(b). It is 3

FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's motions to expedite, for default, and to correct the docket be dismissed as moot.

4

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 41.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Hat Ranch, Inc. v. United States, Cnty. of Otero, N.M., 102 F.3d 1272 (D.C. Cir. 1996) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list