Maxwell-Jolly v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc.
David Maxwell-Jolly, Director, California Department of Health Care Services v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc. (two judgments) David Maxwell-Jolly, Director, California Department of Health Care Services v. California Pharmacists Association David Maxwell-Jolly, Director, California Department of Health Care Services v. California Hospital Association David Maxwell-Jolly, Director, California Department of Health Care Services v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc. and David Maxwell-Jolly, Director, California Department of Health Care Services v. Lydia Dominguez, By and Through Her Mother and Next Friend, Lisa Brown David Maxwell-Jolly, Director, California Department of Health Care Services v. Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petitions. The cases are consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.
Same cases below, (No. 09-958) 572 F.3d 644 (first judgment) and 342 Fed. Appx. 306 (second judgment); (No. 09-1158) 596 F.3d 1098 (first judgment), 563 F.3d 847 (second judgment), 374 Fed. Appx. 690 (third judgment), 596 F.3d 1087 (fourth judgment); and (No. 10-283) 380 Fed. Appx. 656 .
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 11 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF KS & MID-MO v. Brownback
- PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF CENTRAL NC. v. Cansler
- Planned Parenthood v. Cansler
- California Hospital Ass'n v. Maxwell-Jolly
- Inclusion, Inc. v. Armstrong
- Community Pharmacies of Indiana, Inc. v. Indiana Family & Social Services Administration & Its Subdivision
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.