TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Richards v. Moore

Justo Richards v. Rev. Dr. Earl B. Moore, Assistant Commissioner, Ministerial and Family Services, James Festa, Family Reunion Coordinator, Auburn Correctional Facility, Shirley R. Baker, Regional Coordinator

Richards v. Moore, 107 F.3d 4 (2d Cir. 1997)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
February 21, 1997
Docket
No. 96-2499
Citations
107 F.3d 41997 WL 785901997 U.S. App. LEXIS 7070
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

107 F.3d 4

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. SEE SECOND CIRCUIT RULE 0.23. Justo RICHARDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rev. Dr. Earl B. MOORE, Assistant Commissioner, Ministerial and Family Services, James Festa, Family Reunion Coordinator, Auburn Correctional Facility, Shirley R. Baker, Regional Coordinator, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-2499.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Feb. 21, 1997.

1

APPEARING FOR APPELLANT:JUSTO RICHARDS, pro se, Fallsburg, NY.

2

APPEARING FOR APPELLEE:VICTOR PALADINO, Assistant Attorney General (Peter H. Schiff, Deputy Solicitor General, Nancy A. Spiegel, Assistant Attorney General, Dennis C. Vacco, Attorney General, Albany, NY, on the brief).

3

Before JACOBS, CALABRESI, LAY, * Circuit Judges.

4

This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of record from the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York and was taken on submission.

5

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED for the reasons stated in the District Court's Memorandum-Decision and Order, filed May 30, 1996, and those stated in the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Homer, filed March 14, 1996, which was adopted in full by the District Court.

6

We have considered all of Appellant Justo Richards's arguments, including his retaliation claim raised for the first time here on appeal, and find them to be without merit.

* The Honorable Donald P. Lay, Senior Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list