Manson v. Stacescu
David MANSON v. Anca STACESCU
Manson v. Stacescu, 513 U.S. 915 (1994)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Justice BREYER took no part in the con- ■ sideration or decision of this petition.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 4 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(holding that removal to federal district court was proper and affirming the district court judgment against Sweeneys)
-
(denying request to prevent RTC 5 from foreclosing on property secured by note owned by failed institution)
-
(“It is the insured’s initial discharge, however, not the resulting damage or pollution, that is the focus of the inquiry under the pollution exclusion clauses.”)
-
(before judgment was entered by the trial court)
Cited by 47 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals17
- Federal District Courts26
- State Highest Courts2
- State Appellate Courts1
- State Trial Courts1
Relies on it most ⓘ
- Department of Economic Development v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
- Unistrut Space Frame Systems, Inc. v. Atlantic Plate & Window Glass, Co.
- Development Finance Corporation the National Housing and Health Care Trust, Inc. v. Alpha Housing & Health Care, Inc. v. John Sower Wilbur Dove, Third Party Sylvan Associates, Inc., ( Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.)
- In re American Express Company Shareholder Litigation
- Resolution Trust Corporation, as Conservator for Great American First Savings Bank v. Bayside Developers
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Admiral Insurance Co.
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.