TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Wojciechowski v. Montevideo Partnership

Christopher R. WOJCIECHOWSKI v. MONTEVIDEO PARTNERSHIP

Wojciechowski v. Montevideo P'ship, 527 U.S. 1056 (1999)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
August 23, 1999
Docket
No. 98-1924
Citations
527 U.S. 1056120 S. Ct. 22144 L. Ed. 2d 82568 U.S.L.W. 31371999 U.S. LEXIS 4641

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Application for stay addressed to Justice SOUTER and referred to the Court denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

  • (affirming district court’s denial of motion to recuse under § 455(a) based on alleged bias or prejudice or lack of partiality by the undersigned against the attorney for a party based on the circumstance that the attorney was named as a witness to testify against the judge)

Cited by 25 cases

View all citing references →
1999: 22000: 72001: 102003: 12005: 12006: 12008: 12011: 12019: 119992026peak 2001 · 10

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Mack Oran Hill v. Gary L Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division210 F.3d 481 (5th Cir. 2000)
  2. Beazley v. Johnson242 F.3d 248 (5th Cir. 2001)
  3. Michael Patrick Moore v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division225 F.3d 495 (5th Cir. 2000)
  4. Rudd v. Johnson256 F.3d 317 (5th Cir. 2001)
  5. Martin v. Cain246 F.3d 471 (5th Cir. 2001)
  6. Miller v. Dretke431 F.3d 241 (5th Cir. 2005)

Most recent

  1. Green v. RodriguezNo. 3:19-cv-01051 (D. Conn. Oct. 3, 2019)
  2. Word v. Lord648 F.3d 129 (2d Cir. 2011)
  3. Keith Nelson v. United States297 F. App'x 563 (8th Cir. 2008)
  4. Henderson v. Quarterman460 F.3d 654 (5th Cir. 2006)
  5. Miller v. Dretke431 F.3d 241 (5th Cir. 2005)
  6. Roth v. Mims298 B.R. 272 (N.D. Tex. 2003)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list