TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Sasson v. Sokoloff

Robert SASSON v. Norman F. SOKOLOFF, Individually and as Trustee for Camelot Medical Group, Inc., Profit Sharing Plan

Sasson v. Sokoloff, 126 S. Ct. 2890 (9th Cir. 2006)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 19, 2006
Docket
No. 05-1171
Citations
126 S. Ct. 2890547 U.S. 1206165 L. Ed. 2d 91774 U.S.L.W. 37022006 U.S. LEXIS 4701

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 17 cases

View all citing references →
2006: 32007: 62008: 52009: 12010: 12011: 120062026peak 2007 · 6

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Hospitality Ventures/LaVista v. Heartwood 11, L.L.C. (In re Hospitality Ventures/LaVista)358 B.R. 462 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2007)
  2. Gradco Corp v. Blankenship (In re Blankenship)408 B.R. 854 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 2009)
  3. Lopez v. Emergency Service Restoration, Inc. (In re Lopez)367 B.R. 99 (9th Cir. BAP 2007)
  4. Padilla v. GMAC Mortgage Corp. (In re Padilla)389 B.R. 409 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2008)
  5. Hickman v. Hana (In re Hickman)384 B.R. 832 (9th Cir. BAP 2008)
  6. Adelson v. Smith (In re Smith)389 B.R. 902 (Bankr. D. Nev. 2008)

Most recent

  1. Gordon Properties, LLC v. First Owners' Ass'n (In re Gordon Properties, LLC)460 B.R. 700 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2011)
  2. Doster v. State72 So. 3d 50 (Ala. Crim. App. 2010)
  3. Gradco Corp v. Blankenship (In re Blankenship)408 B.R. 854 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 2009)
  4. Little MacK Entertainment II, Inc. v. Township of Marengo625 F. Supp. 2d 570 (W.D. Mich. 2008)
  5. Padilla v. GMAC Mortgage Corp. (In re Padilla)389 B.R. 409 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2008)
  6. Adelson v. Smith (In re Smith)389 B.R. 902 (Bankr. D. Nev. 2008)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list