Morley v. Ontos, Inc.

T. Mark MORLEY v. ONTOS, INC.

Morley v. Ontos, Inc., 128 S. Ct. 166 (1st Cir. 2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided: October 1, 2007
Docket: No. 06-1661
Citations: 128 S. Ct. 166552 U.S. 823169 L. Ed. 2d 3376 U.S.L.W. 31572007 U.S. LEXIS 9290

Cited by 15 2 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(observing: “[Sjettled Pennsylvania law provides ‘a restraining principle that counsels against reaching a constitutional question if a non-constitutional ground for decision is available’ ”)

Commonwealth v. Griffiths, 15 A.3d 73 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2010)
(stating rules of appellate procedure apply to criminal and civil cases alike)

Commonwealth v. Velez-Nieves, No. 1674 MDA 2021 (Pa. Super. Ct. Dec. 15, 2022)

Cited by 15 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Commonwealth v. Moore, S.No. 1638 EDA 2022 (Pa. Super. Ct. Nov. 8, 2023)
Commonwealth v. Fransen986 A.2d 154 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2009)
Commonwealth v. Farabaugh136 A.3d 995 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016)
Grose v. Caruso284 F. App'x 279 (6th Cir. 2008)
Commonwealth v. Griffiths15 A.3d 73 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2010)
Cassandra Williams v. Port Huron Area School Dist455 F. App'x 612 (6th Cir. 2012) · Dissent

Most recent

Commonwealth v. Moore, S.No. 1638 EDA 2022 (Pa. Super. Ct. Nov. 8, 2023)
Commonwealth v. Velez-Nieves, L.No. 1674 MDA 2021 (Pa. Super. Ct. Dec. 15, 2022)
Patriot Grp. v. Fustolo (In re Fustolo)597 B.R. 1 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2019)
Reed v. Zak (In re Zak)573 B.R. 13 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2017)
Commonwealth v. Farabaugh136 A.3d 995 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016)
Gohl ex rel. J.G. v. Livonia Public Schools134 F. Supp. 3d 1066 (E.D. Mich. 2015)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list