Cadle Co. v. Friedheim

The CADLE COMPANY v. Joseph M. FRIEDHEIM, et ux.

Cadle Co. v. Friedheim, 129 S. Ct. 287 (5th Cir. 2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided: October 6, 2008
Docket: No. 08-133
Citations: 129 S. Ct. 287555 U.S. 887172 L. Ed. 2d 15077 U.S.L.W. 32032008 U.S. LEXIS 5590

Cited by 29 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(rejecting an ex post facto challenge to the Tennessee Serious and Violent Sex Offender Monitoring Pilot Project Act, which "subject[s] a convicted sexual offender to a satellite- based monitoring program for the duration of his probation")

State v. Jones, 129 A.3d 383 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2016)

Cited by 29 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Hilliard v. Jacobs916 N.E.2d 689 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009)
Riley v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE32 A.3d 190 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2011)
State v. Bowditch700 S.E.2d 1 (N.C. 2010)
State v. Grady831 S.E.2d 542 (N.C. 2019)
Saieg v. City of Dearborn641 F.3d 727 (6th Cir. 2011)
United States v. Tagg572 F.3d 1320 (11th Cir. 2009)

Most recent

State of Tennessee v. Robert M. Atwell, Jr.No. E2021-00067-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App. Mar. 1, 2022)
Commcan, Inc., and Others v. Charlie Baker, in His Official Capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of MassachusettsNo. 2084CV00808-BLS2 (Mass. Super. Ct. Apr. 27, 2020)
Richard Terry Woodson v. State of TennesseeNo. M2018-02153-CCA-R3-PC (Tenn. Crim. App. Jan. 24, 2020)
State v. Grady831 S.E.2d 542 (N.C. 2019)
John Doe v. Rausch382 F. Supp. 3d 783 (E.D. Tenn. 2019)
Matthew B. Foley v. State of TennesseeNo. M2015-00311-CCA-R3-PC (Tenn. Crim. App. Jan. 21, 2016)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list