TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Fields v. Bleiman

Albert J. FIELDS v. Jack BLEIMAN

Fields v. Bleiman, 555 U.S. 1033 (2008)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
November 17, 2008
Docket
No. 08-5768
Citations
555 U.S. 1033129 S. Ct. 597172 L. Ed. 2d 45877 U.S.L.W. 32952008 U.S. LEXIS 8352

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Case below, 267 Fed.Appx. 144 .

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

  • (concluding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in decertifying a damages class because “Rule 23(b)(3) would not offer a superior method for fair and efficient adjudication in light of expected difficulties identifying class members”)

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
2009: 22010: 22011: 12012: 12014: 12015: 12020: 12021: 120092026peak 2009 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Hoffman995 F. Supp. 2d 555 (E.D. Va. 2014)
  2. Bull v. City and County of San Francisco595 F.3d 964 (9th Cir. 2010)
  3. United States v. White552 F.3d 240 (2d Cir. 2009)
  4. Moore v. Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.311 F.R.D. 590 (C.D. Cal. 2015)
  5. Lasky v. MOORESTOWN TP.42 A.3d 212 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2012)
  6. United States v. Harris636 F.3d 1023 (8th Cir. 2011)

Most recent

  1. DOUGLAS v. ORTIZNo. 1:20-cv-03284 (D.N.J. Apr. 23, 2021)
  2. Halloran v. United StatesNo. 7:18-cv-01559 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 6, 2020)
  3. Moore v. Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.311 F.R.D. 590 (C.D. Cal. 2015)
  4. United States v. Hoffman995 F. Supp. 2d 555 (E.D. Va. 2014)
  5. Lasky v. MOORESTOWN TP.42 A.3d 212 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2012)
  6. United States v. Harris636 F.3d 1023 (8th Cir. 2011)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
In re Albert Fields, 267 F. App'x 144 (3d Cir. 2008) 7

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list