TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Hardman

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT v. JAMES I. HARDMAN

State v. Hardman, 92 A.2d 27 (N.J. 1952)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 10, 1952
Citations
92 A.2d 2710 N.J. 4681952 N.J. LEXIS 263

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heiter, Oliphant, Jacobs and Brennan — 5.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1955: 12010: 119552026peak 1955 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services9 A.3d 882 (N.J. 2010)
  2. In re Cardinale115 A.2d 125 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1955)

Most recent

  1. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services9 A.3d 882 (N.J. 2010)
  2. In re Cardinale115 A.2d 125 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1955)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list