Rose v. Buckley
Mulford T. Rose v. George J. Buckley, Margaret V. Buckley and Ida Reinhardt
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Ingersoll, V. C.
I recently filed a memorandum as follows:
“At the time of the hearing there was pending in the Atlantic county circuit court proceedings in attachment *1046 brought by Eose against the defendant Buckley and others, for the return of the money paid by him' on account of the purchase of the property described in his'bill of complaint.”
I am now informed that this writ of attachment was dismissed on March 14th, 1924.
I desire to hear counsel’s views upon the question, “Was the issuance of this writ an election by complainant [plaintiff] and is it now binding upon him ?”
The court of errors and appeals in an opinion in Claron v. Thommessen, filed very recently, and not yet reported, states fhe rule to be:
“When he [the purchaser] instituted suit ágainst Ciaron [the seller] to recover the deposit money, he irrevocably committed himself in solemn form to a repudiation of all obligation under the agreement. Having taken this step in rescission of the contract, he will not now be permitted to seek its enforcement in a court of’conscience,”
This court is bound by this statement óf the law as expressed by the court of errors and appeals, and the bill must therefore be dismissed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.