TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Als v. Wells

Samuel Als v. N.C. Wells City of Newport News, and J.A. Carey, Former Chief of Police for the City of Newport News, Virginia Barry E. Duval, Mayor of the City of Newport News, Virginia

Als v. Wells, 107 F.3d 865 (4th Cir. 1997)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
March 4, 1997
Docket
No. 96-7048
Citations
107 F.3d 8651997 WL 906421997 U.S. App. LEXIS 7502
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

107 F.3d 865

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Samuel ALS, Plaintiff--Appellant, v. N.C. WELLS; City of Newport News, Defendants--Appellees, and J.A. Carey, Former Chief of Police for the City of Newport News, Virginia; Barry E. Duval, Mayor of the City of Newport News, Virginia, Defendants.

No. 96-7048.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 13, 1997. Decided: March 4, 1997.

Samuel Als, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Michael Kaine, MEZZULLO & McCANDLISH, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; Allen Link Jackson, Deputy City Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying his motion for a subpoena duces tecum. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

2

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

3

DISMISSED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949) 8,958

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list