Schock v. Board of Review
ROBERT C. SCHOCK v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
The opinion of the court was delivered Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Kilkenny for the majority of the Appellate Division. 89 N. J. Super. 118 (App. Div. 1965). See also: Sarja v. Iron Range Resources & Rehabilitation, Minn., 144 N. W. 2d 377 (1966).
The Chief Justice and Justices Jacobs and Proctor dissent and vote to reverse for the reasons expressed in the dissent of Judge Conford in the Appellate Division.
For affirmance — Justices Francis, Hall, Schettino and Haneman — 4.
For reversal — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs and Proctor — 3.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(claimant-truck driver found disqualified by reason of misconduct as a result of leaving the company truck unattended with its motor running and going into a tavern for a beer)
Cited by 9 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.