TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Henderson v. Miller

Henderson v. Miller, 12 N.J. Eq. 140 (1858)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New Jersey Court of Chancery · State Appellate Courts
Decided
October 15, 1858
Citations
12 N.J. Eq. 140
Headnotes
Who are necessary parties to a bill.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

The Chancellor.

It has already been decided, upon demurrer in this case ( 2 Stock. 322 ), that the personal representative of Abrahams is a necessary party.

Also, that the heirs of Aaron P. Wright are necessary parties.

Also, that the heirs or devisees of Charles Wright are necessary parties.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Freedman v. Fineberg, 100 A. 179 (N.J. 1917) 0

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list