TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Barned v. Barned

Barned v. Barned, 21 N.J. Eq. 245 (1870)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New Jersey Court of Chancery · State Appellate Courts
Decided
October 15, 1870
Citations
21 N.J. Eq. 245
Headnotes
1. A mortgage is presumed to be satisfied, if no claim lias been made and no interest paid upon it within twenty years after it becomes due, and no circumstances are shown to explain the delay and rebut the presumption. 2. Payment will not be presumed, because the statute of limitations lias, at law, barred a suit on the bond.
Summary
Argued upon final bearing, on bill, answer, and proofs.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

The Chancellor.

The bill was filed November 10th, 1869, to foreclose a mortgage made April 7th, 1847, to secure a sum payable in three years from the date. The mortgage was accompanied by a bond with the same condition, on which no interest was paid after April, 1848. The defendant sets up the statute of limitations. . I must take the rule in such case to be settled by the decision of Chancellor Vroom, in Wanmaker’s Ex’r v. Van Buskirk, Saxt. 685, that a mortgage is presumed to be satisfied, if no claim has been made, and no interest paid upon it within twenty years after it becomes due, and no circumstances are shown to explain the delay and rebut the • presumption; and that payment will not be presumed, because the statute of limitations has, at law, barred a suit on the bond. In the Wanmaker case, the statute of limitations had clearly run as against the bond, but it was held that the mortgage was valid, and that presumption of payment did not exist.

The complainant is entitled to a decree.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1929: 119292026peak 1929 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Wilson v. Stevens148 A. 392 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1929)

Most recent

  1. Wilson v. Stevens148 A. 392 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1929)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list