TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hoffman v. Hoffman

Barbara Hoffman v. Michael Hoffman Joseph Rouse State of Mary Land Assignment Office of Circuit Court, Anne Arundel County Kerry Anderson David Bowers Gale Ann Belucci Richard Bacharach, M.D. Department of Social Services Ginger Howard Ingrid Hoffman Sue Houser Pam Ziolkowski Bernie Divver Eastern District Police Department of Anne Arundel County Tracey Agnew Krystle Hoffman

Hoffman v. Hoffman, 108 F.3d 1372 (4th Cir. 1997)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
March 18, 1997
Docket
No. 96-2814
Citations
108 F.3d 13721997 WL 1226801997 U.S. App. LEXIS 10401
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

108 F.3d 1372

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Barbara HOFFMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael HOFFMAN; Joseph Rouse; State of Mary land; Assignment Office of Circuit Court, Anne Arundel County; Kerry Anderson; David Bowers; Gale Ann Belucci; Richard Bacharach, M.D.; Department of Social Services; Ginger Howard; Ingrid Hoffman; Sue Houser; Pam Ziolkowski; Bernie Divver; Eastern District Police Department of Anne Arundel County; Tracey Agnew; Krystle Hoffman, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-2814.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 13, 1997. Decided March 18, 1997.

Barbara Hoffman, Appellant Pro Se.

Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing her complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (d) (1994), as amended by Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hoffman v. Hoffman, No. CA-96-3541-AMD (D.Md. Nov. 25, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list