Mason v. City of Paterson
WILLIAM MASON, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS v. CITY OF PATERSON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF PATERSON, ETC., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS AND v. ARTHUR DWYER, ACTING MAYOR, ETC., AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS CITY OF PATERSON, ETC. v. ARTHUR C. DWYER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Pur Curiam.
The (rial court held, among other things, that the statute establishing the form of government for the City of Paterson was unconstitutional. 120 N. J. Super. 184 .(Law Div. 1972).. On motion, we certified the appeals prior to consideration in the Appellate Division.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons given by the trial court. There is reserved to the trial court authority to amend the timetable in paragraphs 6, 7 and 8 of the judgment if circumstances shall so warrant.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub, Justices Jacobs, Proctor, Hall, Mountain and Sullivan and Judge Oonford — 7.
For reversal — Hone.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned)
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.