TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Sandler v. Lawn-A-Mat Chemical & Equipment Corp.

JOSEPH J. SANDLER v. LAWN-A-MAT CHEMICAL & EQUIPMENT CORP.

Sandler v. Lawn-A-Mat Chem. & Equip. Corp., 366 A.2d 658 (N.J. 1976)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 23, 1976
Citations
366 A.2d 65871 N.J. 5031976 N.J. LEXIS 905
Cited by 15

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Petition for certification denied. (See 141 N. J. Super. 437)

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 15 cases

View all citing references →
1977: 11979: 11981: 31982: 11983: 11984: 21985: 11987: 21990: 11991: 219772026peak 1981 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Goodman v. London Metals Exchange, Inc.429 A.2d 341 (N.J. 1981)
  2. Ellmex Const. Co., Inc. v. Republic Ins. Co.494 A.2d 339 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1985)
  3. Chicago Title Insurance Corp. v. Goldberg (In re Goldberg)12 B.R. 180 (Bankr. D.N.J. 1981)
  4. A-S Development, Inc. v. W. R. Grace Land Corp.537 F. Supp. 549 (D.N.J. 1982)
  5. Public Service Electric & Gas Co. v. Technology for Energy, Corp. (In re Technology for Energy, Corp.)123 B.R. 979 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1991)
  6. Noye v. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.570 A.2d 12 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1990)

Most recent

  1. Public Service Electric & Gas Co. v. Technology for Energy, Corp. (In re Technology for Energy, Corp.)123 B.R. 979 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1991)
  2. Wong v. Mercado590 A.2d 723 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1991)
  3. Noye v. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.570 A.2d 12 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1990)
  4. Whitfield v. Whitfield535 A.2d 986 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1987)
  5. Buckley v. TRENTON SAV. FUND SOC.524 A.2d 886 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1987)
  6. Ellmex Const. Co., Inc. v. Republic Ins. Co.494 A.2d 339 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1985)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list