Serkin v. Township of Ocean
LEWIS A. SERKIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE 1079, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT v. TOWNSHIP OF OCEAN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND MARTIN L. BAILEY, COLLECTOR OF TAXES, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS HUXLEY HOLDING COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT v. TOWNSHIP OF OCEAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT J.R.H. ELECTRICAL-MECHANICAL CONTRACTING CORP., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT v. TOWNSHIP OF OCEAN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment of the Law Division for the reasons stated in the written opinion of Judge Rimm of February 8, 1983. 201 N.J.Super. 392 .
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.