Smith v. Borough of Barnegat Light
ETHAN ALLEN SMITH, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS v. THE BOROUGH OF BARNEGAT LIGHT
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CURIAM.
This matter comes before us by way of appellants’ motion for a stay pending appeal. By separate order we have denied that motion. .We have accelerated the appeal for purposes of argument and disposition because it involves an election matter. See R. 1:2—5(1).
On our own motion we summarily affirm the judgment below substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Serpentelli in *12 his written opinion of June 4, 1987, reported at 219 N.J.Super. 231 (Law Div.1987). See R. 2:8-3(b).
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(summarily deciding election matter initially presented on a motion for stay pending appeal)
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.