Wolfersberger v. Borough of Point Pleasant Beach
JOSEPH WOLFERSBERGER, JR. v. BOROUGH OF POINT PLEASANT BEACH, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Wolfersberger v. Borough of Point Pleasant Beach, 702 A.2d 1284 (N.J. 1997)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 305 N.J.Super. 446 , 702 A.2d 1294 (1996).
For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ, and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN and COLEMAN — 7.
Opposed — None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.