TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Fonar Corporation v. Magnetic Resonance Plus, Inc.

Fonar Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant, Laurence Shiff v. Magnetic Resonance Plus, Inc. And Robert Domenick, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees

Fonar Corp. v. Magnetic Resonance Plus, Inc., 114 F.3d 355 (2d Cir. 1997)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 22, 1997
Docket
No. 837
Citations
114 F.3d 35537 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 122242 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 18931997 U.S. App. LEXIS 11850

Opinion

114 F.3d 355w 1997 Copr.L.Dec. P 27,642 , 37 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1222

FONAR CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant, Laurence Shiff, Appellant, v. MAGNETIC RESONANCE PLUS, INC. and Robert Domenick, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees.

No. 837, Docket 95-7847.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued Jan. 30, 1997. Decided May 22, 1997.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list