TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Keefe M. Martin v. Dana Corporation. Keefe Martin

Martin v. Dana Corp.. Keefe Martin, 114 F.3d 421 (3d Cir. 1997)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 12, 1997
Docket
No. 96-1746
Citations
114 F.3d 421155 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 252573 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 18031997 WL 3130541997 U.S. App. LEXIS 13791

Opinion

114 F.3d 421w 155 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2525 , 73 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1803, 65 USLW 2824 , 134 Lab.Cas. P 10,015

Keefe M. MARTIN v. DANA CORPORATION. Keefe Martin, Appellant.

No. 96-1746.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued April 15, 1997. Decided June 12, 1997.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1997: 41998: 219972026peak 1997 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Blakely v. USAirways, Inc.23 F. Supp. 2d 560 (W.D. Pa. 1998)
  2. Clifford Brisentine v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation117 F.3d 519 (11th Cir. 1997)
  3. Dalton v. Jefferson Smurfit Corp.979 F. Supp. 1187 (S.D. Ohio 1997)
  4. Vargas v. Gromko977 F. Supp. 996 (N.D. Cal. 1997)
  5. Chopra v. Display Producers, Inc.980 F. Supp. 714 (S.D.N.Y. 1997)
  6. Cleotis Johnson v. Bodine Electric Co. And International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 601142 F.3d 363 (7th Cir. 1998)

Most recent

  1. Blakely v. USAirways, Inc.23 F. Supp. 2d 560 (W.D. Pa. 1998)
  2. Cleotis Johnson v. Bodine Electric Co. And International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 601142 F.3d 363 (7th Cir. 1998)
  3. Chopra v. Display Producers, Inc.980 F. Supp. 714 (S.D.N.Y. 1997)
  4. Dalton v. Jefferson Smurfit Corp.979 F. Supp. 1187 (S.D. Ohio 1997)
  5. Vargas v. Gromko977 F. Supp. 996 (N.D. Cal. 1997)
  6. Clifford Brisentine v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation117 F.3d 519 (11th Cir. 1997)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list