In re Painewebber Incorporated Limited Partnerships Litigation
In Re Painewebber Incorporated Limited Partnerships Litigation Rochelle Rittmaster, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Robert Jacobson, Vera Jacobson, Painewebber Group, Inc. Painewebber, Inc.
Opinion
117 F.3d 721
In re PAINEWEBBER INCORPORATED LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS LITIGATION Rochelle RITTMASTER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert JACOBSON, Vera Jacobson, Appellants, PaineWebber Group, Inc.; PaineWebber, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 2403, Docket 97-7540.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued July 15, 1997. Decided July 30, 1997.
Edward T. Joyce, Chicago, IL, for Appellants.
Edward Labaton, New York City (Nicholas E. Chimicles, Fred Taylor Isquith, Edward Grossmann, Burton H. Finkelstein, David J. Bershad, of counsel), for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Matthew Gluck, New York City (Peter L. Simmons, Rachel S. Fleishman, of counsel), for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: WINTER, Chief Judge, JACOBS and LEVAL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
Robert and Vera Jacobson appeal from Judge Stein's approval of a settlement and allocation agreement in this class action and denial of the Jacobsons' motions to intervene and to be certified as subclass representatives. We affirm for the reasons set forth in Judge Stein's opinions. In re PaineWebber Ltd. Partnerships Litig., 171 F.R.D. 104 (S.D.N.Y.1997); In re PaineWebber Ltd. Partnership Litig., --- F.R.D. ----, No. 94 Civ. 8547(SHS) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 26, 1996).
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 13 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.