TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Venner v. Belmont

Venner v. Belmont, 143 N.Y.S. 161 (1913)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
July 25, 1913
Citations
143 N.Y.S. 161
Headnotes
1. Costs (§ 164*)—Amount—Extra Allowance. Where the action was an ordinary action for libel, and the rules of law governing it simple and elementary, it was not a difficult and extraordinary case, within the statute allowing additional costs for such cases, although the defendant had expended a large amount of money investigating the past life of plaintiff, seeking matter, to plead in justification. [Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Costs, Cent. Dig. §§ 620-636 ; Dec. Dig. § 164.*3 2. Libel and Slander (§ 101*)—Justification—Presumption. The presumption is that, when one publishes libelous matter, he already possesses information justifying the charge. [Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Libel and Slander, Cent. Dig. §§ 150, 273, 275-280 ; Dec. Dig. § 101.*]
Summary
Appeal from Special Term, Kings County. Action by Clarence H. Venner against August Belmont. Plaintiff moved for leave to discontinue on payment of costs, and defendant moved for an extra allowance. Leave to discontinue granted, and extra allowance denied, and defendant appeals. Affirmed. The opinion of Blackmar, J., at Special Term, referred to by the court, is as follows: [1] This is not a difficult and extraordinary case, within the meaning of the section of the Code authorizing an extra allowance. It is an ordinary action for a libel. The rules of law governing it are simple and elementary. It is true that the defendant has expended large sums of money in investigating the past life of the plaintiff, seeking matter to plead in justification, and has succeeded in discovering enough to enable him to set forth in his answer a biography of the plaintiff stretching over 118 printed pages. [2] The presumption should be that, when one publishes libelous matter, he already possesses information justifying the charge. The fact that an expensive and elaborate investigation is necessary to secure evidence in justification, while it may indicate that the defense is difficult, does not make the case a difficult one. Motion to discontinue on payment of taxable costs granted. Motion for an extra allowance denied.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed, on the opinion of Blackmar, J., at Special Term.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list