TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Maria-Kelley F. Yniguez Jaime P. Gutierrez, and Arizonans Against Constitutional Tampering - and State of Arizona Rose Mofford Robert Corbin v. Arizonans for Official English Robert D

Maria-Kelley F. Yniguez Jaime P. Gutierrez, and Arizonans Against Constitutional Tampering, Intervenors-Plaintiffs- and State of Arizona Rose Mofford Robert Corbin v. Arizonans for Official English Robert D. Parks, Intervenors-Defendants- Maria-Kelley F. Yniguez v. State of Arizona Rose Mofford Robert Corbin, and Arizonans for Official English Robert D. Parks, Intervenors-Defendants- Maria-Kelley F. Yniguez v. State of Arizona Rose Mofford Robert Corbin

Maria-Kelley F. Yniguez Jaime P. Gutierrez, & Arizonans Against Constitutional Tampering - & State of Ariz. Rose Mofford Robert Corbin v. Arizonans for Official English Robert D, 118 F.3d 667 (9th Cir. 1997)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
July 1, 1997
Docket
No. 93-15061
Citations
118 F.3d 667

Opinion

118 F.3d 667

Maria-Kelley F. YNIGUEZ; Jaime P. Gutierrez, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Arizonans Against Constitutional Tampering, Intervenors-Plaintiffs- Appellees, and State of Arizona; Rose Mofford; Robert Corbin, et al., Defendants-Appellees, v. ARIZONANS FOR OFFICIAL ENGLISH; Robert D. Parks, Intervenors-Defendants- Appellants. Maria-Kelley F. YNIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF ARIZONA; Rose Mofford; Robert Corbin, et al., Defendants-Appellees, and Arizonans for Official English; Robert D. Parks, Intervenors-Defendants- Appellants. Maria-Kelley F. YNIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STATE OF ARIZONA; Rose Mofford; Robert Corbin, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 92-17087, 93-15061 and 93-15719.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

July 1, 1997.

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.

Before HUG, Chief Judge, and WALLACE, PREGERSON, REINHARDT, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, FERNANDEZ, KLEINFELD and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

1

The judgment of the en banc court, 69 F.3d 920 (9th Cir. 1995), is vacated and the case is remanded to the original three-judge panel with instructions to remand to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 1055 , 137 L.Ed.2d 170 (1997).

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona, 520 U.S. 43 (1997) 2,093

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list