TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Katz v. Nassau Electric R. Co.

Katz v. Nassau Elec. R. Co., 154 N.Y.S. 2 (1915)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
June 28, 1915
Judges
Guy
Citations
154 N.Y.S. 2
Headnotes
Carriers @=>318—Injury to Passenger—Negligence—Sufficiency of Evidence. In an action against a street railroad for injuries received by. a passenger while alighting, evidence held insufficient to show any negligence on part of defendant. [Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Carriers, Cent. Dig. §§ 1270; 1307-1314; Dec. Dig. @=>318.] For other cases see same topic & KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests & Indexes
Summary
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District. Action by Minnie Katz against the Nassau Electric Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Reversed, and coriiplaint dismissed.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Guy

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

GUY, J.

The plaintiff has recovered a judgment for damages for personal injuries. negligence charged in the complaint is after defendant’s car, in which plaintiff was a passenger, was stopped to allow her to alight, and before she was given opportunity to alight, it was suddenly started, throwing her to the street and causing the injuries complained of.

The plaintiff herself was the only witness to prove the negligence of the defendant, and she testified that on July 4, 1914, she was “riding in the car, and the car stopped, and I waited until all went off. I was the last to get off. I commenced to get off, and he whistled, and I fell off.” She subsequently stated that the person who whistled was the conductor, and then subsequently stated that "she did not remember hearing the conductor whistle. The facts testified to were palpably insufficient to make out a prima facie case of negligence, no negligence of any kind was shown, and- the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint should have been granted.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. All concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1958: 11959: 11962: 11964: 11965: 11966: 11969: 11972: 119582026peak 1958 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Roman Catholic Diocese of Newark v. Ho-Ho-Kus Borough202 A.2d 161 (N.J. 1964)
  2. Stern v. Larocca140 A.2d 403 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1958)
  3. Roman Catholic Diocese of Newark v. Ho-Ho-Kus Borough220 A.2d 97 (N.J. 1966)
  4. Flicker v. Chenitz150 A.2d 688 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1959)
  5. Delaware River and Bay Auth. v. INTERNATIONAL ORG. ETC.211 A.2d 789 (N.J. 1965)
  6. Yeomans v. All State Ins. Co.296 A.2d 96 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1972)

Most recent

  1. Yeomans v. All State Ins. Co.296 A.2d 96 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1972)
  2. Ind. Elec. Assoc. of NJ v. NJ Bd. of Exam.256 A.2d 33 (N.J. 1969)
  3. Roman Catholic Diocese of Newark v. Ho-Ho-Kus Borough220 A.2d 97 (N.J. 1966)
  4. Delaware River and Bay Auth. v. INTERNATIONAL ORG. ETC.211 A.2d 789 (N.J. 1965)
  5. Roman Catholic Diocese of Newark v. Ho-Ho-Kus Borough202 A.2d 161 (N.J. 1964)
  6. Kraynick v. Nationwide Ins. Co.178 A.2d 50 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1962)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list