United States v. Riley
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven Lawrence RILEY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 99-2426.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Nov. 8, 2000.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (No. 98-00288-CR-T-26E); Richard A. Lazzara, Judge. Before TJOFLAT, COX and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
We sua sponte grant rehearing in this appeal. Our opinion is published at 211 F.3d 1207 (11th Cir.2000). After we filed our opinion in this appeal, but before the mandate issued, the Supreme Court decided
Castillo v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 120 S.Ct. 2090 , 147 L.Ed.2d 94 (2000), which casts doubt on the
correctness of our ruling rejecting Riley's challenge to the enhanced penalty the district court imposed on him under 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)(1). We accordingly vacate the portion of our prior opinion addressing the § 924(c)
sentencing issue and direct the clerk to schedule the appeal for oral argument on that issue before a regular oral-argument panel.
REHEARING GRANTED; OPINION VACATED IN PART; ORAL ARGUMENT GRANTED IN PART.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.