TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Court of County Revenue v. Town of Russellville

Court of County Revenue of Franklin County v. Town of Russellville

Court of Cnty. Revenue v. Town of Russellville, 58 So. 253 (Ala. 1912)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Alabama · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 4, 1912
Judges
Anderson, Doavdell, Mayfield, McClellan, Sayre, Simpson, Somerville
Citations
58 So. 253176 Ala. 6091912 Ala. LEXIS 65
Disposition
Reversed and rendered.
Headnotes
Mandamus to Compel Commissioners’ Court to Fay City Pro Rata of Road Tax. Ilif/hways; Taxation; Distribution. — As to special road taxes collected under section 215, Constitution 1901, Acts 1909, p. 304, is inoperative, said act applying only to a division of the general fund for road tax.
Summary
Appeal from Franklin Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. C. P. Almon, Petition by the town of Russellville for mandamus against the court of county revenue of Franklin county, and the members thereof to require them to pay over to the town certain portions of a special levy made for roads and bridges. From a judgment granting the prayer of petitioners respondents appeal. The levy Avas a special levy, and the taxes gathered Avas a special tax for the roads and bridges of the county, and the fund thus raised could not be diverted from its purpose.- — Sec. 215, Constitution 1901; Bowrd of Revenue of Jefferson County v. State ex rel. City of Birmingham, 54 S'outh. 757; Commissioners1 Court of Pike County v. City of Troy, 56 South. 131. Roads and streets are synonymous. — McCain v. State, 62 Ala. 138; Webb v. City of Demopolis, 95 Ala. 116. The money Avas collectable under section 1335, Code 1907. — Bd. Rev. Jefferson County v. City of Birmingham, 54 South. 757.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Simpson

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

SIMPSON, J.

The petition in this case Avas filed by the tOAvn of Russellville, the appellee, for a Avrit of mandamus to compel the court of county revenue, appellant, to pa.y over to said petitioner its legal share of the amount collected under a special levy for roads and bridges. It appears, from the petition and the admission of the parties, that a special levy Avas made, under section 215 of the Constitution, of 1901, for roads and bridges, by the court of county revenue; and it is a part of this fund which it is sought to have paid over to the tOAvn of Russellville, under the act of 1909 (Acts 1909, p. 304).

This court has previously fully considered this matter, and has held that where the levy is a special one, under said section of the Constitution, the Legislature is Avithout authority to have a portion of the money realized from said tax paid over to municipal authorities. *611 —Board of Revenue of Jefferson County v. State ex rel. City of Birmingham, 172 Ala. 138 , 54 South. 757 ; Commissioners of Pike County v. City of Troy, 173 Ala. 442 , 56 South. 131 .

There is no intimation in the record that this ivas not a special levy under said section of the Constitution, but only an apportionment of a part of the general levy of 50 cents on the $100, levied for general county purposes, as in the Birmingham Case, supra. It results that the court erred in granting the writ in this case.

The judgment of the court is reversed, and a judgment Avill be here rendered, dismissing the petition.

Reversed and rendered.

Doavdell, C. J., and Anderson, Sayre, and Somerville, JJ., concur. McClellan and Mayfield, JJ., not sitting.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1914: 11946: 11962: 119142026peak 1914 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Jefferson County v. City of Birmingham27 So. 2d 584 (Ala. 1946) · Dissent
  2. City of Montgomery v. Montgomery County64 So. 588 (Ala. 1914)
  3. Inland Mutual Insurance Company v. Hightower145 So. 2d 422 (Ala. 1962)

Most recent

  1. Inland Mutual Insurance Company v. Hightower145 So. 2d 422 (Ala. 1962)
  2. Jefferson County v. City of Birmingham27 So. 2d 584 (Ala. 1946) · Dissent
  3. City of Montgomery v. Montgomery County64 So. 588 (Ala. 1914)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Bd. of Revenue of Jefferson Co. v. State ex rel. City of Birmingham, 54 So. 757 (Ala. 1910) 31
Comm'rs Court of Pike Cnty. v. City of Troy, 56 So. 131 (Ala. 1911) 12

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list