TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Martinez v. Meyers

Martinez v. Meyers, 61 So. 810 (Ala. 1913)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Alabama · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 17, 1913
Judges
Dowdell, McClellan
Citations
61 So. 810181 Ala. 2931913 Ala. LEXIS 139
Disposition
Reversed, rendered, and remanded.
Headnotes
Bill to Correct Guardianship Settlement. Guardian and Ward; Investment; Liability for Profits. — Where, by a single transaction, a guardian invested the funds of his ward in railroad stocks and bonds, and then sold the bonds for a sum equal to the amount invested, and afterwards sold the stock for $2,603.00, and fraudulently represented that the profit was only $100.00, he was liable for the balance of the proceeds of the stock.
Summary
Appeal from Mobile Law and Equity Court. Heard before Hon. Saffold Bernex. Bill by Mary J. Martinez and others against Elizabeth D. Meyers and others to correct a guardianship settlement on the ground of fraud. From a decree sustaining demurrer to part of the bill, complainants appeal. The allegations of the bill to which demurrers were sustained is that respondent, as guardian, invested a sum of money of the wards in bonds and stocks of a railroad company, the said transaction being single, and that she then sold the bonds alone for enough money to replace that invested, and had the stock left and that she later sold the stock for $2,603, which was all profit, but fraudulently represented that the profit was only $103, and defrauded the wards out of the other $2,500. The bonds and stocks were in those of the Meridian Light & Railroad Company. The bill was not subject to the demurrer, and the. court was in error in sustaining the same. — Meyers v. Martinez, 172 Ala. 641; s. c. 167 Ala. 456; s. c. 162 Ala. 562. The court properly sustained the demurrer. —Martinez v. Meyer, 167 Ala. 456.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — McClellan

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

McCLELLAN, J.

This is the fourth appeal in this cause. — Meyers v: Martinez, 162 Ala. 562 , 50 South. 351 ; Martinez v. Meyers, 167 Ala. 456 , 52 South. 592 ; Meyers v. Martinez, 172 Ala. 641 , 55 South. 498 . Under the authority of Meyers v. Martinez, 172 Ala. 641 , 55 South. 498 , the court erred in sustaining the demurrer “to so much of the said bill as seeks to charge defendant Elizabeth D. Meyers with the proceeds of the sale of stocks of the Meridian Light and Railroad Company.” The demurrer addressed to the whole bill was overruled. Upon that authority the decree appealed from is re■versed. A decree is here entered, overruling the demurrer ; and the cause is remanded.

Reversed, rendered, and remanded.

All the Justices concur, except Dowdell, C. J., not sitting.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1917: 11935: 119172026peak 1917 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Evans v. Evans76 So. 95 (Ala. 1917)
  2. White v. White162 So. 368 (Ala. 1935)

Most recent

  1. White v. White162 So. 368 (Ala. 1935)
  2. Evans v. Evans76 So. 95 (Ala. 1917)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Meyers v. Martinez, 55 So. 498 (Ala. 1911) 6
Meyers v. Martinez, 50 So. 351 (Ala. 1909) 16
Martinez v. Meyers, 52 So. 592 (Ala. 1910) 10

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list