TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hays v. State

Hays v. State, 63 So. 7 (Ala. 1913)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Alabama · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 30, 1913
Judges
Anderson, Dowdell, Graeeenried, Hon, Mayfield, Pearce
Citations
63 So. 7183 Ala. 761913 Ala. LEXIS 551
Disposition
Affirmed.
Headnotes
Murder. Homicide; Evidence; Motive. — Where there was evidence that defendant had threatened to kill deceased because deceased had reported him for violating the prohibition law, the affidavit charging defendant with the violation of that law, signed by deceased, was admissible in evidence, as tending to show motive.
Summary
Appeal from Covington Circuit Court. Tom Hays was convicted of murder and he appeals. The affidayit signed by deceased charging defendant with the violation of the prohibition law was admissible to show motive in view of the evidence of threats made by defendant. — Overstreet v. State, 46 Ala. 30; Marler v. State, 67 Ala. 55; Duncan v. State, 88 Ala. 31; Tate v. State, 94 Ala. 14.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Mayfield

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

MAYFIELD, J.

— The defendant was indicted, convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment, for the murder of R. D. Sowell.

The record proper appears to be regular, and discloses no reversible error. The transcript shows a waiver of a special venire, made in writing and entered of record, as is authorized by section 7264 of the Code.

The bill of exceptions shows objections or exceptions to only one matter during the progress of the trial, and that "was as to the introduction in evidence of an affidavit, made by deceased, charging the defendant with a violation of the prohibition laws touching the sale of intoxicating liquors. This evidence was admissible, in connection with other evidence to show motive. There was evidence showing threats made by defendant to kill the deceased, and for the reason that deceased had reported him for the violation of the law; and, according to the witness Kaufman, that defendant, speaking to the witness and referring to the deceased, had used this language: “That damned man there swore a lie against me, and I am going to kill him.”

The affidavit, under the circumstances, was clearly admissible in evidence. A motive to commit a crime is to be inferred from other facts, and is not, on account of its nature,'susceptible of direct proof; yet evidence which shows or tends to show facts from which the jury may infer motive is admissible in evidence. — Fowler v. State, 155 Ala. 21 , 45 South. 913 ; Ward v. State, 153 *78 (Ala. 9, 45 South. 221 ] Nordan v. State, 143 Ala. 13 , 39 South. 406 .

Affirmed.

Dowdell, C. J., and Anderson and de Graeeenried, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 23 cases

View all citing references →
1915: 11917: 21918: 51919: 41920: 11923: 11924: 11925: 21927: 11932: 11937: 11940: 11962: 11992: 119152026peak 1918 · 5

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Young v. State96 So. 381 (Fla. 1923) · Dissent
  2. Harper v. State69 So. 302 (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
  3. Henderson v. State of Florida113 So. 689 (Fla. 1927)
  4. Kersey v. State74 So. 983 (Fla. 1917)
  5. Settles v. State78 So. 287 (Fla. 1918)
  6. Hobbs v. State81 So. 444 (Fla. 1919)

Most recent

  1. Peeples v. State601 So. 2d 186 (Ala. Crim. App. 1992)
  2. Bowden v. State137 So. 2d 621 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1962)
  3. Dean v. State197 So. 53 (Ala. 1940)
  4. Lewis v. State177 So. 205 (Fla. 1937)
  5. McKinlay v. State141 So. 882 (Fla. 1932)
  6. Henderson v. State of Florida113 So. 689 (Fla. 1927)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Fowler v. State, 45 So. 913 (Ala. 1908) 31
Nordan v. State, 143 Ala. 13 (1904) 38
Ward v. State, 45 So. 221 (Ala. 1907) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list