Holder v. Bain
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
SOMERVILLE, J.
The plaintiff in ejectment claims title by deed from Mary Newman, who, it is claimed, inherited the property in suit from her father, one Lollis.
It does not appear that Lollis ever had any title to or possession of the land, nor indeed that he ever even claimed it. Nor does it appear that Mary Newman ever had title or possession. Plaintiff concedes that he himself has never had possession, and it is shown without dispute that defendants have had possession for 10 or 12 years.
On this evidence the trial court should have given the general affirmative charge for defendants as requested *591 by them, and not for plaintiff, as was actually done. —Gist v. Beaumont, 104 Ala. 347 , 16 South. 20 ; Jackson Lumber Co. v. McCreary, 137 Ala. 278 , 34 South. 850 ; Dodge v. Irvington Land Co., 158 Ala. 91 , 48 South 383 , 22 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1100; Fleatcher v. Riley, 169 Ala. 433 , 53 South. 816 .
For the errors of the trial court in these particulars,, the judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded! for another trial. ^_ ¡
Reversed and remanded.
Anderson, C. J., and McClellan and Sayre, JJ., - concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.