TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Karilyn Bonomolo-Hagen v. Clay Central-Everly Community School District, David Holmquist

Karilyn BONOMOLO-HAGEN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CLAY CENTRAL-EVERLY COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant, David Holmquist, Defendant-Petitioner

Karilyn Bonomolo-Hagen v. Clay Cent.-Everly Cmty. Sch. Dist., David Holmquist, 121 F.3d 446 (8th Cir. 1997)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
August 15, 1997
Docket
No. 97-3174
Judges
McMillian, Bowman, Loken
Citations
121 F.3d 44675 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 12841997 WL 4675731997 U.S. App. LEXIS 21512

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

The District Court, applying precedent from the Northern District of Iowa, and observing that our Court had not yet definitively resolved the question, held that as the plaintiffs supervisor defendant David Holmquist could be held individually hable under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Accordingly, the District Court denied Holmquist’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs Title VII claims against him, but certified the question pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (b), thus permitting Holmquist to seek an interlocutory appeal.

Holmquist’s petition for permission to appeal is granted, and the District Court’s denial of Holmquist’s motion to dismiss is reversed. Our Court quite recently has squarely held that supervisors may not be held individually liable under Title VII.

See Spencer v. Ripley County State Bank, 123 F.3d 690, 691-92 (8th Cir.1997). Thus the question left open in Lenhardt v. Basic Institute of Technology, Inc., 55 F.3d 377 (8th Cir.1995) (holding that under the Missouri Human Rights Act individual liability may not be imposed on supervisors), has been resolved.

Spencer establishes the law of our circuit. We therefore reverse and remand for entry of an order granting Holmquist’s motion to dismiss.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 67 cases

View all citing references →
1997: 11998: 21999: 22002: 22003: 42005: 22007: 52009: 32013: 12018: 42019: 12020: 102021: 42022: 62023: 62024: 62025: 62026: 219972026peak 2020 · 10

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Lovett v. Mercy Rehab Hospital St. LouisNo. 4:19-cv-03106 (E.D. Mo. Oct. 1, 2020)
  2. Chatman v. Gentle Dental Center of Waltham973 F. Supp. 228 (D. Mass. 1997)
  3. Habben v. City of Fort Dodge472 F. Supp. 2d 1142 (N.D. Iowa 2007)
  4. Lovett v. Mercy Rehab Hospital St. LouisNo. 4:19-cv-03106 (E.D. Mo. Sept. 4, 2020)
  5. Birchfield v. Compass Health NetworkNo. 4:24-cv-01575 (E.D. Mo. May 21, 2025)
  6. McCullough v. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences559 F.3d 855 (8th Cir. 2009)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Alfreda Spencer v. Ripley Cnty. State Bank Ronald D. Brooks, 123 F.3d 690 (8th Cir. 1997) 67
Lenhardt v. Basic Inst. of Tech., Inc., 55 F.3d 377 (8th Cir. 1995) 44

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list