TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Brewer v. Kaul Lumber Co.

Brewer v. Kaul Lumber Co., 69 So. 84 (Ala. 1915)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Alabama · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 13, 1915
Judges
Anderson, Gardner, McClellan, Sayre
Citations
69 So. 84193 Ala. 2691915 Ala. LEXIS 142
Disposition
Corrected as to the appealing respondents and affirmed.
Headnotes
Bill to Enjoin Trespass and for Damages. 1. Equity; Decree Pro Oonfesso; Evidence. — Evidence of recoverable damages is necessary in a bill for trespass, notwithstanding the taking of a decree pro confesso. 2. Trespass; Persons Liable. — Where the bill was filed against B., M. and P. for trespass on land by cutting and removing timber therefrom, and the evidence showed that P. alone caused the injury complained of, before either B. or M. was associated with him, said B. and M. were not liable, and the money judgment should have been confined to P.
Summary
Appeal from Shelby County Court. Heard before Hon. E. S. Lyman. Bill by the Kaul Lumber Company against J. R. Phillips and others to enjoin a trespass and for a recovery of damages. From a decree for complainant, the respondents Brewer and Moore appeal. The bill alleges that complainant is the owner of certain lands, valuable only for timber purposes, and that respondents own and operate a sawmill on adjoining lands, and have entered upon, wrongfully and unlawfully cut and carried away timber from said land; that the trespasses have been repeated and continued, although respondents and their agents and servants have been repeatedly warned not to do so. The bill alleges that Phillips was alone until the 19th day of October, 1913, but since that time has associated with him Brewer and Moore, and that they, together with Phillips, have continued to trespass. There was decree pro confesso, and, after proof taken as to the damage, judgment was entered decreeing a money judgment of $225 against respondents named.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Sayre

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

SAYRE, J.—

(1,2) After the decree pro confesso-, evidence was necessary to prove the recoverable damages. The proof of damages, in connection with the averments of the bill, disclosed the fact that the defendant Phillips alone, and before the defendants appellants, Brewer and Moore, were “associated” with him, had caused the injury for which complainant sought damages. In these circumstances defendants Brewer and Moore should not have been charged with the dam *271 ages covered, by the decree for money. In other respects the decree was correct and is not complained of. The decree will be corrected at the cost of the appellee, so' as to relieve Brewer and Moore of the decree for damages. In other respects the decree will be affirmed.

Corrected and affirmed.

Anderson, C. J., and McClellan and Gardner, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1925: 11937: 11957: 119252026peak 1925 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Aiken v. McMillan106 So. 150 (Ala. 1925)
  2. Lavretta v. First Nat. Bank of Mobile178 So. 3 (Ala. 1937)
  3. Odem v. McCormack97 So. 2d 574 (Ala. 1957)

Most recent

  1. Odem v. McCormack97 So. 2d 574 (Ala. 1957)
  2. Lavretta v. First Nat. Bank of Mobile178 So. 3 (Ala. 1937)
  3. Aiken v. McMillan106 So. 150 (Ala. 1925)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list