Lewis v. State
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
ANDERSON, C. J. —
Section 3019 of the Code of 1907 provides that: “Bills of exceptions may be presented at *2 any time within ninety clays from the day on which the judgment is entered, and not afterwards.”
The judgment in this case was rendered and entered October 21, 1914, and the bill was not presented to the trial judge until January 22, 1915, more than 90 days after the rendition of the judgment, and the motion of the state to strike same must be sustained. It is true that the sentence was not imposed - until October 24th, but the judgment of conviction, as disclosed by the record, was rendered and entered October 21st, and the time runs from the rendition and entry of the judgment, and not from the date of sentence. — Ramey v. State, 9 Ala. App. 51 , 64 South. 168 .
As the bill of exceptions must be stricken, and as no reversible error is disclosed by the record proper, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Mayfield, Somerville, and Thomas, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.