TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Farmer v. Johns-McBride Engineering Service

Farmer v. Johns-Mcbride Engineering Service.

Farmer v. Johns-McBride Eng'g Serv., 54 So. 2d 708 (Ala. 1951)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Alabama · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 18, 1951
Docket
No. 8 Div. 584
Judges
Livingston, Foster, Simpson, Goodwyn
Citations
54 So. 2d 708256 Ala. 3351951 Ala. LEXIS 92

Opinion of the Court — Livingston

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

LIVINGSTON, Chief Justice.

The appeal is from a decree of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, in Equity.

The appellees instituted the proceeding to establish and foreclose a mechanic’s and materialman’s lien on a building and lands described in the bill of complaint. Title 33, § 37 et seq., 'Code 1940. The amount secured by the lien was alleged to be $600.

The answer of appellant sought to offset or reduce the amount claimed to be due, on the ground that the workmanship of appellees was not up to standard practices with regard to such work and that he had been damaged as a result thereof.

The trial court found that the house in question had been damaged to the extent of one hundred and fifty dollars, ($150), and rendered a decree for appellees in the amount of $450; established a lien on the property described in the bill and ordered its sale in default of the payment of the sum of $450, and interest, within thirty days. From that decree this appeal is prosecuted.

The one assignment of error presents for review the sufficiency of the evidence to support the decree rendered by the lower court.

The cause was submitted to the court below on the depositions of witness which requires an examination of the evidence by this court. This duty we have performed.

The record presents purely a question of fact, and on which the evidence is in conflict. After careful consideration of the record we are of the opinion that the decree of the trial court is correct and is due to be affirmed.

Affirmed.

FOSTER, SIMPSON and GOODWYN, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1955: 11958: 11962: 11976: 119552026peak 1955 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Saliba v. Lunsford106 So. 2d 176 (Ala. 1958)
  2. Miles v. Moore79 So. 2d 432 (Ala. 1955)
  3. Jones v. Gladney339 So. 2d 1019 (Ala. 1976)
  4. Grand Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. Hermione Lodge No. 16, Knights of Pythias64 So. 2d 405 (Ala. 1962)

Most recent

  1. Jones v. Gladney339 So. 2d 1019 (Ala. 1976)
  2. Grand Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. Hermione Lodge No. 16, Knights of Pythias64 So. 2d 405 (Ala. 1962)
  3. Saliba v. Lunsford106 So. 2d 176 (Ala. 1958)
  4. Miles v. Moore79 So. 2d 432 (Ala. 1955)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list