Duckett v. State
Duckett v. State.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
SIMPSON, Justice.
Petition for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review the judgment and opinion of that court in Duckett v. State, 60 So.2d 357 .
The petition is not on transcript paper, as required by Supreme Court Rule 36, Code 1940, Title 7, Appendix, and we have no alternative but to strike it. So ordered. Stovall v. Stovall, Ala.Sup., 57 So.2d 641 ; 1 Bates v. General Steel Tank Co., 256 Ala. 466 , 55 So.2d 218 ; Maddox v. City of Birmingham, 255 Ala. 440 , 52 So.2d 166 ; Nix v. State, 251 Ala. 1 , 36 So.2d 456 ; Barnett v. Patillo, 251 Ala. 1 , 36 So.2d 451 ; Anderson v. State, 251 Ala. 32 , 36 So.2d 244 ; Farley v. State, 251 Ala. 391 , 37 So.2d 440 ; Johns v. Thomas H. Vaughn & Co., 251 Ala. 489 , 38 So.2d 21 ; Haney v. State, 250 Ala. 664 , 36 So.2d 117 ; Allen v. State, 249 Ala. 201 , 30 So.2d 483 ; Peterson v. State, 248 Ala. 179 , 27 So.2d 30 . See Ex parte Wood, 215 Ala. 280 , 110 So. 409 . Petition stricken.
FOSTER, LAWSON and STAKELY, JJ., concur.
. Ante, p. 124.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 10 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.