Bernadine Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
Bernadine SUITUM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY, Defendant-Appellee
Opinion
This case having been heard by the United States Supreme Court and reversed, has been remanded to this court for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of the Supreme Court. In its Opinion, the Supreme Court indicated that upon remand, this court should consider the second prong of the two-part test from Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172 , 105 S.Ct. 3108 , 87 L.Ed.2d 126 (1985).
Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, — U.S. —, — n.8, 117 S.Ct. 1659 , 1665 n. 8, 137 L.Ed.2d 980 (1997). Because this issue was not addressed by the district court nor raised before this court, it is best considered by the district court in the first instance.
Therefore, the Opinion reported at 80 F.3d 359 (9th Cir.1996) is VACATED and this case is REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.