TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Talliaferro's Executors v. King's Administrator & Heirs

Talliaferro's Executors v. King's Administrator and Heirs

Talliaferro's Executors v. King's Adm'r & Heirs, 39 Ky. 331 (1840)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Kentucky · State Appellate Courts
Decided
May 6, 1840
Citations
39 Ky. 3319 Dana 3311840 Ky. LEXIS 25
Headnotes
Where a note contains an express stipulation for the payment of interest annually or ‘at the end of each year,’ each instalment of interest bears interest from the time when it became payable.
Summary
Debt. From the Circuit Court for Bracken County.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Judge Ewing

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

John King executed to George C. Talliaferro, the following note:—

“For value received, I promise to pay to George C. Talliaferro, six hundred dollars, on or before the 29th day of June, 1829; yet it is understood that the interest is to be paid at the end of each year; as witness my hand this 29th day of June, 1822.”

And the only question is whether interest should be allowed upon the sums stipulated to be paid in interest, from the end of each year, when the same fell due.

The interest, by the terms of the covenant, is made payable at the end of each year, and is as much then demandable, as if a specific sum equal to the amount of interest had been promised, and in default of payment, as much entitles the plaintiff to demand interest upon the amount so due and unpaid. The fact that the amount so promised to be paid, is described as interest accruing upon a larger sum, which is made payable at a future day, cannot the less entitle the plaintiff to demand interest upon the amount, in default of payment, as a just remuneration in damages for the detention or non-payment.

It is, therefore, the opinion of the Court, that the judgment of the Circuit Court be reversed, and cause remanded, that judgment may be rendered according to the principles here indicated; and the plaintiff in error is entitled to his costs in this Court.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 11 cases

View all citing references →
1865–1866: 21867–1868: 11875–1876: 11877–1878: 11891–1892: 21909–1910: 11911–1912: 11939–1940: 11943–1944: 118652026peak 1865 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. McWilliams v. Northwestern Mut. Life Ins. Co.147 S.W.2d 79 (Ky. Ct. App. 1940)
  2. Doe v. Vallejo29 Cal. 385 (1866)
  3. Cox v. Smith1 Nev. 161 (1865) · Concurrence
  4. Levens v. Briggs14 L.R.A. 188 (Or. 1891)
  5. Radford v. Southern Mutual Life Ins.75 Ky. 434 (1876)
  6. Burke v. Trabue's Extx.126 S.W. 125 (Ky. Ct. App. 1910)

Most recent

  1. In re the Liquidation of the Chinese American Bank36 Haw. 571 (1943)
  2. McWilliams v. Northwestern Mut. Life Ins. Co.147 S.W.2d 79 (Ky. Ct. App. 1940)
  3. Pensacola & Atlantic Railroad v. Hilton's Trustee144 S.W. 1077 (Ky. Ct. App. 1912)
  4. Burke v. Trabue's Extx.126 S.W. 125 (Ky. Ct. App. 1910)
  5. Levens v. Briggs14 L.R.A. 188 (Or. 1891)
  6. Mt. Mansfield Hotel Co. v. Bailey64 Vt. 151 (1891)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list