Morrison v. M'Millan
MORRISON v. M'MILLAN, &c.
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
*210 ' Opinion op the Court, by Judge Owsley.' *
THIS was an ejectment brought by Morrison in the ¿0¿).r,t below, to recover from M’Millan, &c. .the posses-^ &f-two lots, No.s13 and 14, in the towffHi Cynt^?* apa. - fí, fe.
The trial was had in that court on the general iAsspef an<^ a verdict .and judgment recovered by th^Refend-ants. .Mr ’
The cause turns in this court on the question, whiither.2 not t’ne circuit court-decided correctly i»*éxcIii-"E dirfg from .the jury, a deed of conveyance whic|i was in-troduefed as evidence by the plaintiff.
deed purports to Ijave been made by. the triis-©/the town to tíre plaintiff, and was rej'ecfpd from *211 ® ® ? § . £•?!. ~ £-S^ g, b- ® jf'crfi- 3-.^ x .CD to CD' >~ ®. .g*. t-t- - * g- 9^0 -*® 2f o*®1 a -m 2 0> -a ri'v *3 ^ cr o*wSE a S'»; *- <ys& Mf3!;j ®?§foE:f o fyrKS CD ^ f& >-j M. af w O rt< ■5* &# ^,'0*^ s^uc" ^ cf §,:#Í>S CD ■ o ^ 3. ty fD C«*. O ^5-» c prm$ g:Ui «* g. CD o ; a- sr CD » < CO < 0s CD ; 3 ef | CD CD CD M p/;£ . o^S i%l •-ET* -, o-.crq» fa ^ .. oCn4^ o- &-§•“ ¡^/. - sie-f ' gJjM ■ «¿f • ■ 'g5t g-cifCg. g^S, g.g1 , ^ . & & ® tr,? 0 ,<k-^'o JS JS <£¿3 § S- >“*6 ' 5 o & !?.. ? £ -s* ® o -
. x - * "' *¡ ' 3 0.áP?A® <■>4 Sb ^ ® *J re := oSisT®©»©® ai- ®. ® o> ©•- ~^ái£f I? if iff sr r3 ' - STtf „ Co, jrí; S3 wj-©"'^T S- P ' £.» O 3 E,® &.*-< p-2*SL S' fs SGT ® «é hr^ * CT WO (5 P ^ CD $■ 2- ¿S2|:'3-,So © -g’ to g o cd a © ,_ a. o-ro' DSCU 'D-r-f©' °b3 J r-t- rr^jp*- ^ |~ o CD -CD • era qtp ^ % ^v<vM ® ra »■ ® 3 -» p.s:o c„ s-g- a-gre, cd aq. . et ^ a _ S' ¡D-Cr^ J2LGTQ £L cr cd ^-oñ* £ 2^ <-*■ J “ “ ~ S ® ■^o.o ñ a o's-® ” 3- ^2 S'SS0' u - d cr f : ,:St ! 'CD J p , a* k* s: cy.-o *~t- co j¡¡3 a . r±, vutXK. Ü* CTiOA ydR . ¡fi ©■ i». í?TSfjff-^h <■■ ® ^ s . . c cw 3;*^ c'-.^ o —-I g> ^ m ^ CD g #. , P ^ ° 3 O' a o)^ fp 3_ tfl pl ^OQ*^ *0 a g ■ o to
Í - as beta?-: * ' ’«8 )@* <D - „ ; “S ip. rc: *><y £. -r &v w 7CU JP-V tfl ctf O#-,® »?n ■*J,En3 VI 5 rp! , O *<Ej * : T3 P a cr : cr'' d a. CD g O- CD '6b'u 9 O -b" ; ^ K C-,_0 f- ^ 3" P « ere o - pr^s St p hS tór* irt, ggfs^íLj^ *•*«>9^ 2 ^ *-r"'S'’ÍP¿^2u c 'g^® 3c«’ wkn <f§ =o-(a.a» s^ 5:«<*0 3 2 4 < 5- ® c 3s-" í fecr1» :^S4a n5v9i,^». o
CD CD ^ ,©,. = *g- ^ * &o L ¡A, *-*-a. .’CD 2- ^ $ -" g cd cj a 0 O- ei: *3,-° ^ a* ESL 00 c*»- S. CO rsg^¡ o a rt- cn, 5. c- ar ^y.,S^S>,5i ^ p'"] 3 CSSC6 B f< S»^w*r ^ pr ¿ s S-p- n*-^ o S'* D OD CD p CD pb D c-to sve-r ^ o S t-f o 0&W a cw q Qp | Cj ® ,K¡ ; -g-'r ^ £^k & ■*Q es ¿ CD ST-lf $ ■»- CD w 5Í’ CDvjjTÍ ÍT, ^ a <>P r£.*^ £.!SíW^cd a>;k. S*Si3 a cr S3 ii CD V- g-a p 'S'-o'g ■gsX.'S»- . - t^, £ 'aaste ¿ o s S * O « P^táu'rQ O, MjSv
*212 £ -o . g ’ ->o J3'-' II' • 3 .5 fcfl a % «■ o CJ > tí Or O o #o '|U t tí t s r«- ■ cv ^ <D > nO > o> ) £ o ó n> re r* O 5
£.•**8 . M S’ *?*! I & o _ o ct> •e tí § 'S "S . 3 -£ o A c -a -g O fl a o o o Q- < S3- 53 • O' w t., o o ^ On (¿ CP9 tí 3 o°-tí-, cj o fcD S o <v !í o. SiV-, tí- T’" o o S^pí : ? ^
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.