Herman v. Department of Treasury

Joseph W. HERMAN v. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY

Herman v. Dep't of Treasury, 507 U.S. 932 (1993)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: February 22, 1993
Docket: No. 92-6926
Citations: 507 U.S. 932113 S. Ct. 1315122 L. Ed. 2d 70261 U.S.L.W. 35831993 U.S. LEXIS 1441

Cited by 96 3 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(corpus delicti requirement met where there was overwhelming evidence that several crimes occurred; additionally, corroborative evidence supported conviction)

United States v. Matthews, 25 F.3d 1051 (6th Cir. 1994)
("scope of a search is generally defined by its express object")

United States v. Osuorji, 32 F.3d 1186 (7th Cir. 1994)
(side panel compartment of hatchback)

Cardenas v. State, 857 S.W.2d 707 (Tex. App. 1993)

Cited by 96 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

United States v. Roberto Martinez7 F.3d 146 (9th Cir. 1993)
United States v. Jenkins4 F.3d 1338 (6th Cir. 1993)
United States v. Albert Thomas (92-4344) and Angelique Dupree (93-3026)11 F.3d 620 (6th Cir. 1993)
United States v. Charles v. Leake998 F.2d 1359 (6th Cir. 1993)
United States v. Brad Eugene Branch, Kevin Whitecliff, Jaime Castillo, Renos Lenny Avraam, Paul Fatta and Graeme Leonard Craddock91 F.3d 699 (5th Cir. 1996)
United States v. Jenkins4 F.3d 1338 (6th Cir. 1993)

Most recent

Robert Brown v. Kentucky Parole Board490 F. App'x 693 (6th Cir. 2012)
Bennett v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institute782 F. Supp. 2d 466 (S.D. Ohio 2011)
State v. Jenkins3 A.3d 806 (Conn. 2010)
MacK v. Jones540 F. Supp. 2d 840 (E.D. Mich. 2008)
Handy v. State930 A.2d 1111 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2007)
Kevin Mark Abela v. William Martin, Director, Michigan Department of Corrections380 F.3d 915 (6th Cir. 2004)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list