United States v. Alfredo Iriarte-Ortega
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfredo IRIARTE-ORTEGA, Defendant-Appellant
Opinion
The opinion filed May 9, 1997 [ 113 F.3d 1022 ], is amended as follows:
Slip op. pg. 5492, lines 11-12 [ 113 F.3d at 1024 ]:
Change “fifteen years” to “146 months”.
*1201 Slip op. pg. 5492, footnote 1, line 1 [ 113 F.3d at 1024 ]:
Add ‘Triarte challenges only the first element, i.e., that he entered an agreement to accomplish an illegal objective.
See Brief for Appellant at 26 (“The failure of proof in this case lies entirely in the failure to prove that any agreement was ever made and that Mr. Triarte knowingly and intentionally joined some agreement.”) (emphasis omitted).”.
Start the next sentence in footnote 1 (“Both the government and Iriarte ...”) as a new paragraph.
The petition for rehearing is otherwise denied. The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en bane and no active judge has requested a vote thereon. The suggestion for rehearing en banc is therefore rejected. Fed. R.App. P. 35(b).
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 23 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.