TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

John E. Coonley, as Trustee of the James E. Coonley II Trust Abcm Corporation v. Fortis Benefits Insurance Company

Coonley v. Fortis Benefits Ins. Co., 128 F.3d 675 (8th Cir. 1997)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 30, 1997
Docket
No. 97-1446
Citations
128 F.3d 6751997 WL 6876491997 U.S. App. LEXIS 29885

Opinion

128 F.3d 675

John E. COONLEY, As Trustee of the James E. Coonley II Trust; ABCM Corporation, Appellants, v. FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 97-1446NI.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 22, 1997. Decided Oct. 30, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa; H. Mark W. Bennett, Judge.

Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

John E. Coonley, as Trustee of the James E. Coonley II Trust, and ABCM Corporation appeal an adverse grant of summary judgment on their claim that James E. Coonley II was an insured employee under a group life insurance policy governed by the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. See Coonley v. Fortis Benefits Ins. Co., 956 F.Supp. 841 (N.D.Iowa 1997). Having reviewed the record and the parties' submissions, we conclude that an extensive discussion is not warranted. The district court has written a comprehensive opinion addressing the issues raised by the parties, and we have nothing to add to the district court's analysis. We see no error by the district court and affirm the judgment substantially for the reasons stated in the district court's memorandum opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2003: 120032026peak 2003 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Grynberg v. Questar Pipeline Co.2003 UT 8, 70 P.3d 1

Most recent

  1. Grynberg v. Questar Pipeline Co.2003 UT 8, 70 P.3d 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Coonley v. Fortis Benefit Ins., 956 F. Supp. 841 (N.D. Iowa 1997) 7

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list