TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hutto v. Coulliette

Roy HUTTO and Ernestine Hutto v. William Hannon COULLIETTE, William Addie Coulliette, a minor, and Mrs. W. H. Coulliette

Hutto v. Coulliette, 97 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 1957)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 18, 1957
Judges
Roberts, Rowe, Terrell, Thomas, Thornal
Citations
97 So. 2d 13

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellees to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to 31 F.S.A., Rule 38 of the rules of this court and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

TERRELL, C. J., THOMAS, ROBERTS and THORNAL, J., and ROWE, Circuit Judge, concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list