TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Dade County, Board of Public Instruction v. Michigan Mutual Liability Co.

DADE COUNTY, Florida, BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, a body corporate and politic under the laws of the State of Florida v. MICHIGAN MUTUAL LIABILITY COMPANY, a mutual insurance company organized under the laws of the State of Michigan, Harnett, Inc., a Florida corporation, and George Insurance Agency, Inc., a Florida corporation

Dade Cnty., Bd. of Pub. Instruction v. Mich. Mut. Liab. Co., 169 So. 2d 483 (Fla. 1964)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 9, 1964
Docket
No. 33559
Judges
Caldwell, Connell, Drew, Ervin, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal
Citations
169 So. 2d 483

Opinion of the Court — Ervin

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

ERVIN, Justice.

There has been filed in this cause a suggestion of recusal by the attorneys for appellant. The suggestion is that during my term as Attorney General of the State of Florida I rendered an opinion pled by the appellees in the complaint on one of the points involved in this litigation. During the fifteen years which I served as Attorney General of Florida I rendered several thousand opinions. Obviously my services on the Court as an incumbent Justice thereof would be greatly impaired if it were incumbent upon me to disqualify myself in cases where issues were raised concerning the same subjects on which I expressed opinions while Attorney General. Accordingly for these reasons I must, and do, decline to recuse myself. See Section 30-A Am.Jur., Judges, Sections 169 et seq., and 48 C.J.S. Judges §§ 82, 83, 89, pages 1062, 1063, 1068, 1069, 1076 and 1077.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing declination to recuse himself filed in this cause by Justice Ervin is hereby agreed to and approved.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1970: 11975: 11984: 119702026peak 1970 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Department of Revenue v. Golder322 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1975)
  2. State ex rel. v. Stedman233 So. 2d 142 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)
  3. United States v. Martinez19 M.J. 652 (1984)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Martinez19 M.J. 652 (1984)
  2. Department of Revenue v. Golder322 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1975)
  3. State ex rel. v. Stedman233 So. 2d 142 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list