TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Roberts v. Knoll

O. Hoke ROBERTS et ux. v. John J. KNOLL et ux.

Roberts v. Knoll, 169 So. 2d 496 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida · State Appellate Courts
Decided
December 9, 1964
Docket
No. 5192
Judges
Barns, Paul, Smith, White
Citations
169 So. 2d 496

Opinion of the Court — Barnspaul

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

BARNS, PAUL D., Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from an order sustaining defendants’ motion to dismiss a complaint in an action at law, to-wit: ejectment. The order is “that defendants’ motion to dismiss the second amended complaint be granted.”

The foregoing order is interlocutory and not a final judgment, and not appealable. Wherefore, the

Appeal is dismissed.

SMITH, C. J., and WHITE, J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1980: 119802026peak 1980 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Kozusnik v. Selkowitz379 So. 2d 168 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Most recent

  1. Kozusnik v. Selkowitz379 So. 2d 168 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list